Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Hon. Associate of Economic History Dr. SUDHA SHENOY of UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE, on why Americans are too stupid to diagnose Hindu Uppityness:

"Before 1947, US immigration policies were so restrictive, barely a handful of Indians got in. The tiny quotas were filled for years, even a decade ahead.

Indian (& Asian) immigration could take off from the later 1960s onwards, because immigration regulations now allowed in migrants with technical skills. Hence the huge numbers of technically highly trained Indians in the US. Business migrants were also now allowed in.

In both groups, many came from Indian backgrounds where they learned English as a necessary tool only, & had little or no contact with the wider culture, literature, etc. So they have an excellent technical training/business acumen, but hardly any wider _education_. Naturally they take in Hindutva doctrines completely uncritically: they do not have the foundations to even recognise that such notions have to be considered sceptically. "



Yes, Memsaheb Sudha! These Uppity Natives have to be put in their propah places, Memsaheb!

Dr. Shenoy represents the cream of IER’s international expertise,and as one of the leading economic history teachers in Australia, is clearly more competent than these lay Americans, to decide what should be taught to their American schoolchildren.

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

End Harvard Association of Hate Groups!

February 03, 2006 6:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very observant of Dr. Shenoy, and observed by those of us around the world of the Indians everywhere we have lived. This is a growing problem of Indians using the ancient texts such as the "Manu Smirtri" which is Brahmins' original oppressive document as do other religions using Bible and Koran to assert their nationalist and fundamentalist ideologies. Hindutva must be stopped by western nations as well as all other backward ideologies that impose separateness. When will human beings realise we are the same and embrace one another?

January 04, 2007 10:52 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello Anonymous,
Manu Smirty must have been written by Mr. Smutty, Manu Smriti on the other hand, that is something else. So you probably got your dogmatic doctrines mixed up!

Well, lucky you, being able to communicate in lousy English (just a tip, but you need to brush up on your articles) with the non-oppressive Dr. Shenoys of this world!

Why Indians choose to kick themselves in the butt by degrading their own, I wil never understand. Something to do with the inferiority complex forced onto us by years of invasion, followed by years of colonisation.

Dirty us, reading Manu Smutties, Manunited, Manu Mirchi, Man-u-r-so-irritating, sorry, can't remember which one it is.

A big hug and kiss from an ignorant fellow human whose eyes just got opened to those evil Brahmins who oppressed the country, and kept the others from getting access to Moksha, unlike the nice Koranis and Biblies, who asked all others to join them in their ascension to Paradise (well, not always politely, but ok, the ends justify the means, do they not?)

April 01, 2007 2:18 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. Shenoy surely is judgemental. I am unsure how scientific Indology is? Do they really formulate testable hypothesis and test them rigorously?

February 16, 2010 2:29 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home